The Supreme Court this week took on an abortion case to decide whether Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron can defend his state’s dismemberment abortion ban – Daniel Cameron joins us in studio to discuss the case and oral arguments… and much more!
Category: In The News
Rep. Virginia Foxx shares her pro-life response to extreme pro-abortion measures on Capitol Hill
Following the House passage of the Women’s Health Protection Act and a Capitol Hill hearing on abortion – we speak with Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) for her pro-life response to these extreme pro-abortion measures… and much more!
Katrina Jackson, Marilyn Musgrave Discuss the Hyde Amendment
Louisiana State Senator Katrina Jackson, a prominent pro-life Democrat, responds to claims the Hyde amendment is racist. The Hon. Marilyn Musgrave, vice president of government affairs for the Susan B. Anthony List, explains the history of Hyde and why there’s the pro-life push to protect it today… and much more!
Dannenfelser, Skop: Texas is Right: Mail-Order Abortion is Dangerous for Women
What abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood won’t tell you is that, while mail-order abortion drugs pad their own bottom line, they put women at increased risk of complications like severe pain and bleeding, infection, incomplete abortion and in some cases even death.
Exclusive Interview with Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch
The Supreme Court sets a December 1st date for the Mississippi abortion case – we’re joined in studio by Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch. She shares how she’s preparing for oral arguments and why she says it’s time for Roe v. Wade to be overturned… and much more!
Dannenfelser, Mancini: Oppose Democratic efforts to make abortion taxpayer-funded
We find ourselves in a tremendous moment during the struggle to end abortion. For the first time in decades, there is a nearly universal feeling of hope among pro-life advocates as states advance an unprecedented number of bills that protect women and unborn children. Their optimism is boosted by the prospect that these laws will face a Supreme Court that, for the first time in a long time, seems more favorable toward states’ legitimate interest in protecting innocent life.